Why I Can’t Stand Microsoft

Steve Ballmer said, “9 out of 10 PC users are running Windows.” This may be true, but is that something to brag about when you blatantly rip off a competitor’s marketing strategy like this?

Lone, iconic logo above the door.
T-shirted staff with lanyards.
Glass windows from top to bottom.
Wide open store layout with minimal product placement.

All identical to an Apple Store. Lame.

Microsoft doesn’t necessarily have a bad product in Windows. What they have is an identity problem as a company. Maybe Steve Balmer should enlist different “developers” the next time Microsoft designs a retail store.

HT: Carlos Whitaker

BeDeviant.com runs on the Standard Theme

Standard Theme

The Standard Theme is a premium WordPress theme. Standard is a meticulously crafted and coded personal and professional blogging theme built with industry standards in mind.


With out-of-the-box solutions for social sharing, SEO optimization, advertising and social networks, The Standard Theme will set you up for blogging success. It does all the heavy lifting for you, whether you're a blogging beginner or seasoned pro. Check out The Standard Theme now and get started on your hassle-free blogging adventure!

8 Responses to “Why I Can’t Stand Microsoft”

  1. baker98 October 22, 2009 at 4:23 pm #

    It is a little ridiculous how similar they made the microsoft store to the Apple store. Reminds me of the way a lot of Christians copy the rest of culture so we can have our own parallel universe.
    GodTube copied YouTube
    ChurchCruch copied TechCrunch
    Gosplr copied twitter
    Cheesy Christian T-shirt designers copy just about every corporate logo & slogan.
    The list could go on. Just like you think Microsoft is pathetic for trying to be like Apple, I think most of the world looks at the “Christian” version of their stuff and just laughs at us.

    On another note, why does Microsoft need a store?

  2. Paul Hovey October 22, 2009 at 4:26 pm #

    Microsoft has been copying apple for years. They still are, and probably always will be unless they change their innovation department.
    Case in point:
    Stores (as you mentioned)
    iPod (see: Zune)
    iTunes (see: Zune Marketplace)
    GUI feel (see: Aero)

  3. Chad October 22, 2009 at 5:25 pm #

    So, is Target lame for having the “same” store design/layout as Walmart, or Fareway lame for having the “same” store design/layout as Hy-Vee? I could go on for quite a while with similar “ripoffs” if I wanted to I'm sure, but the fact is that certain layouts work for certain types of stores. Apple doesn't have a patent on their store design, though it wouldn't surprise if they've tried.

    And Paul, as for the Zune and Zune Marketplace being copies of the iPod and iTunes respectively – have you ever even used either of them, or are you just saying things cuz you want to join the MS-bashing? Cuz I've used them and can tell you they're nothing like the iPod and iTunes (which, yes, I have used plenty of).

  4. Justin Wise October 22, 2009 at 9:14 pm #

    Chadley …. Certainly no one is charging Walmart or Fareway with “store design infringement”! However, if it was systemic, across the board, pervasive infringement might have a case.

    Look at is this way: The last two of of Microsoft's huge marketing strategies (“I'm a PC” and The Microsoft store) have been directly borrowed from their competitor. That, to me, is lazy.

  5. Tom Pohl October 22, 2009 at 9:50 pm #

    I don't understand why everyone wants to fight Apple's fights for them. If Apple believes that Microsoft is violating any of their design patents, they have corrective action they can take. If Microsoft wants to blatantly copy the competition, it is up to the market to reward or punish their behavior by their spending habits. As long as Microsoft isn't engaged in anti-competitive behavior let them do whatever they want. I think it's kind of funny to watch :)

  6. Chad October 22, 2009 at 10:25 pm #

    So, is Target lame for having the “same” store design/layout as Walmart, or Fareway lame for having the “same” store design/layout as Hy-Vee? I could go on for quite a while with similar “ripoffs” if I wanted to I'm sure, but the fact is that certain layouts work for certain types of stores. Apple doesn't have a patent on their store design, though it wouldn't surprise if they've tried.

    And Paul, as for the Zune and Zune Marketplace being copies of the iPod and iTunes respectively – have you ever even used either of them, or are you just saying things cuz you want to join the MS-bashing? Cuz I've used them and can tell you they're nothing like the iPod and iTunes (which, yes, I have used plenty of).

  7. Justin Wise October 23, 2009 at 2:14 am #

    Chadley …. Certainly no one is charging Walmart or Fareway with “store design infringement”! However, if it was systemic, across the board, pervasive infringement might have a case.

    Look at is this way: The last two of of Microsoft's huge marketing strategies (“I'm a PC” and The Microsoft store) have been directly borrowed from their competitor. That, to me, is lazy.

  8. Tom Pohl October 23, 2009 at 2:50 am #

    I don't understand why everyone wants to fight Apple's fights for them. If Apple believes that Microsoft is violating any of their design patents, they have corrective action they can take. If Microsoft wants to blatantly copy the competition, it is up to the market to reward or punish their behavior by their spending habits. As long as Microsoft isn't engaged in anti-competitive behavior let them do whatever they want. I think it's kind of funny to watch :)