<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Lead the Free World Using YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bedeviant.com/how-to-lead-the-free-world-using-youtube/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bedeviant.com/how-to-lead-the-free-world-using-youtube</link>
	<description>Faith &#38; Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 04:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bedeviant.com/how-to-lead-the-free-world-using-youtube/comment-page-1#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bedeviant.com/?p=1304#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>then we get to agree to disagree.  =)   
 
Just because there are more means of communication doesn&#039;t meant the substance being communicated is anymore transparent or effective. 
 
Anyway, good blogs, that&#039;s why I read them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then we get to agree to disagree.  =)   </p>
<p>Just because there are more means of communication doesn&#039;t meant the substance being communicated is anymore transparent or effective. </p>
<p>Anyway, good blogs, that&#039;s why I read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Wise</title>
		<link>http://bedeviant.com/how-to-lead-the-free-world-using-youtube/comment-page-1#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bedeviant.com/?p=1304#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>Inaccuarate to whom? You or me?  
 
You may state that for  yourself, but not for me.  
 
I find myself engaged with the White House and presidency like I never have before. I feel more connected to this President than any prior, simply because, as I stated in the post, there are more connection &lt;i&gt;points&lt;/i&gt;. That, to me, is an &quot;open White House.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inaccuarate to whom? You or me?  </p>
<p>You may state that for  yourself, but not for me.  </p>
<p>I find myself engaged with the White House and presidency like I never have before. I feel more connected to this President than any prior, simply because, as I stated in the post, there are more connection <i>points</i>. That, to me, is an &quot;open White House.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bedeviant.com/how-to-lead-the-free-world-using-youtube/comment-page-1#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bedeviant.com/?p=1304#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>I would suggest that the overinfatuation or slobbering love affair everyone has with President Obama will wither and you will realize that he too is flawed.  I worry that we are buying into charisma more than substance and that is what President Obama is banking on.  If it looks good, people will eat it, even if they don&#039;t know what they are eating.   
 
I agree that he has masterfully used social media to his advantage but let&#039;s not confuse that for a new wave of openness into the White House, that is simply a charade. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that the overinfatuation or slobbering love affair everyone has with President Obama will wither and you will realize that he too is flawed.  I worry that we are buying into charisma more than substance and that is what President Obama is banking on.  If it looks good, people will eat it, even if they don&#039;t know what they are eating.   </p>
<p>I agree that he has masterfully used social media to his advantage but let&#039;s not confuse that for a new wave of openness into the White House, that is simply a charade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://bedeviant.com/how-to-lead-the-free-world-using-youtube/comment-page-1#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bedeviant.com/?p=1304#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>Justin, 
 
I think you missed this one completely.  Politics is a game and to state that President Obama has &quot;paved the way for an &quot;open White House&quot; in terms of accessibility and information sharing,&quot; would be completely inaccurate.   
 
President Obama is a master at charismatic politics or &quot;smoke and mirror&quot; politics.  He has the ability to present one thing to make you think you are getting deep and accessible but instead they are putting on a show.  It is a mindgame that many people use to enforce personal boundaries.   
 
In fact, the recent NBC and ABC interviews all were inside the White House but the only reason they were granted access was if they touted his health care program and had no opposition.  That isn&#039;t openness.   
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, </p>
<p>I think you missed this one completely.  Politics is a game and to state that President Obama has &quot;paved the way for an &quot;open White House&quot; in terms of accessibility and information sharing,&quot; would be completely inaccurate.   </p>
<p>President Obama is a master at charismatic politics or &quot;smoke and mirror&quot; politics.  He has the ability to present one thing to make you think you are getting deep and accessible but instead they are putting on a show.  It is a mindgame that many people use to enforce personal boundaries.   </p>
<p>In fact, the recent NBC and ABC interviews all were inside the White House but the only reason they were granted access was if they touted his health care program and had no opposition.  That isn&#039;t openness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

